Welcome. This site exists for one reason: to put political ideas to the test. Too often, our public debates are dominated by slogans and tribal loyalty instead of truth. The Right Is Wrong begins from a different premise: that every claim should be weighed against evidence, logic, and America’s core democratic ideals.
Who’s Behind This?
My name isn’t important. You can call me Karma. I’m one person, not a political party or institution. I write here because I believe truth matters more than tribe, and that democracy depends on our willingness to discard ideas that fail the test of reality.
What “Wrong” Means
When I say the political Right is wrong, I mean something specific:
- Factually false — contradicted by reliable data.
- Logically invalid — inconsistent or based on flawed reasoning.
- Empirically disproven — predictions don’t match outcomes.
- Normatively incoherent — incompatible with America’s own ideals of liberty, equality, and democracy.
By these standards, much of today’s Right falls short.
Why Focus on the Right?
The Left has its flaws, and I’ll address them when needed. But today, the Right holds disproportionate power through mechanisms like gerrymandering, the Senate, the Electoral College, and the Supreme Court. Their policies affect millions, even though many are unpopular with the majority of Americans. That imbalance makes their claims especially urgent to test.
How This Works
Each article about specific claims will follow a simple method:
- Clarify the claim.
- Steelman it (present the strongest version).
- Make it testable.
- Check the evidence.
- Examine the logic.
- Compare predictions to outcomes.
- Deliver a verdict.
- Note what evidence could change the conclusion.
What You’ll Find Here
- Claim Checks: Right-wing quotes analyzed, tested, and refuted.
- Myths vs. Facts: Quick debunkings of common talking points.
- Case Studies: Deep dives into policies and their results.
- Explainers: Breaking down concepts like gerrymandering or supply-side economics.
- History Lessons: Context for today’s debates.
- The Right Is Sometimes Right: Acknowledging valid conservative critiques.
- Positive Vision Posts: Evidence-based ideas for a better future.
- Educational Pages: Fallacies, critical thinking tools, and reasoning guides.
What This Site Is — and Isn’t
This site is: a testing ground for ideas, committed to evidence, reason, and democratic ideals.
This site isn’t: a dunk factory, an echo chamber, or a place for partisan rage.
The Credo
Truth is greater than tribe.
Outcomes matter more than slogans.
Democracy is more precious than demagoguery.
That’s the mission of The Right Is Wrong. Welcome aboard.
Transparency Statement: How I Create Content at The Right Is Wrong
At The Right Is Wrong, I am committed to providing accurate, fair, and evidence-based content to help readers critically engage with political arguments. To achieve this, I use a variety of tools, including advanced AI like ChatGPT, to assist in the content creation process. I believe in being transparent about how my content is created and want to address any potential questions or concerns about this process upfront.
Why I Use AI as a Tool
AI tools like ChatGPT are valuable for improving productivity and brainstorming ideas. They allow me to generate outlines, draft initial content, and explore different perspectives efficiently, so I can focus more on refining arguments, verifying facts, and curating reliable resources. AI helps me ensure consistency and clarity across the website while freeing up time to research and develop nuanced insights.
What I Do to Ensure Quality and Authenticity
While I use AI to assist with drafting, every piece of content published on The Right Is Wrong is thoroughly reviewed, edited, and finalized by me. Here’s what that process looks like:
- Fact-Checking: All claims, data, and arguments generated by AI are verified against reliable sources before publication.
- Editing and Personalization: I add my own voice, insights, and unique perspective to every article. AI may help with drafting, but it does not replace my judgment, expertise, or values.
- Accountability: I take full responsibility for every post, ensuring it reflects the mission and standards of this website.
By the time an article goes live, it is not a raw output from AI—it is the result of careful editing, rigorous fact-checking, and a human touch.
Why This Approach Works
Using AI as a tool allows me to:
- Focus on Quality: With AI handling routine tasks like drafting and brainstorming, more time is spent on refining arguments and researching evidence.
- Stay Timely: Political discourse moves fast, and AI helps me keep up by generating initial drafts quickly.
- Expand Reach: By streamlining the writing process, I can produce more content that helps readers navigate complex issues.
The result is content that is clear, accessible, and grounded in logic, science, and evidence.
Addressing Potential Concerns
“Does using AI mean the content is less credible?”
Not at all. AI is a tool, not a replacement for human expertise. Just as a journalist might use a word processor or a researcher might use data analysis software, I use AI to assist in the process, but the final product is always reviewed and refined by me. You can trust that everything I publish meets the high standards I set for accuracy, fairness, and intellectual honesty.
“Why not write everything yourself?”
While I could write everything from scratch, using AI allows me to focus on the aspects of content creation that matter most—research, analysis, and editing. It’s a way to work smarter, not harder, while maintaining the same level of quality.
“What if someone criticizes the use of AI?”
I welcome constructive feedback, and I’m proud to be transparent about my process. What matters most is the quality of the arguments I present and the evidence I provide. If someone critiques my content, I encourage them to engage with the arguments themselves rather than focusing on the tools used to create them.
My Commitment to You
At The Right Is Wrong, my mission is to promote critical thinking and evidence-based debate. Whether I use AI, traditional writing methods, or any other tool, you can trust that every piece of content reflects:
- A commitment to truth and accuracy.
- A dedication to fairness and intellectual honesty.
- A personal touch that ensures the content reflects the mission and values of this site.
I believe that by being upfront about how I create content, I build trust with my readers and set a standard for transparency in political discourse. If you have questions or concerns about my process, feel free to reach out—I’m happy to engage in thoughtful conversations.